MACINTYRE’S CRITIQUE OF KIERKEGAARD REVISITED
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
The Transcendental Critique Revisited and Revised
ofThe Transcendental Critique Revisited and Revised Dooyeweerd’s account of abstraction is examined and found to be faulty. He holds that abstract thinkingisolates aspects which must then be synthesized, whereas I argue that we cannot isolate any aspect from the othershowever so hard we try. But our very inability to isolate aspects is then turned into an alternative version of ...
متن کاملMaking Sense of Nonsense: Kierkegaard and Wittgenstein
The aim of this paper is to make sense of cases of apparent nonsense in the writings of Kierkegaard and Wittgenstein. Against commentators such as Cora Diamond and James Conant, we argue that, in the case of Wittgenstein, recognising such a category of nonsense is necessary in order to understand the development of his thought. In the case of Kierkegaard, we argue against the view that the noti...
متن کاملKierkegaard , Socrates and Existential Individuality
The 19 century Danish philosopher Søren Kierkegaard was a profoundly religious thinker. He is also regarded as the father of Existentialism, one of the most important philosophical movements of the 20 century. The term ‘existentialist’ is applied to those philosophers, like Jean-Paul Sartre and Albert Camus, who held that the foundation of all philosophical thought is to be found in the actual,...
متن کامل‘Tension between Standardisation and Flexibility’ Revisited: A Critique
This paper is a critique on Hanseth et al. (1996), a study that centres on the question: does standardisation fix the parameters of ICT development and thus hamper innovation. Its conclusions are based on arguments drawn from the classic OSI (Open Systems Interconnection) TCP/IP (Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol) debate. This paper starts with an analysis of the different aspects...
متن کاملTrance logic revisited: a reply to Hilgard's critique.
The analysis presented in 1972 by R. F. Q. Johnson, B. A. Maher, and T. X. Barber indicated that nonhypnotic 5s manifest trance logic as often as "real" hypnotic 5s. E. R. Hilgard's 1972 critique contended that the analysis was misleading because only those 5s should have been included in the analysis who met the stringent criterion for hallucination. This paper shows that when one includes in ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Facta Universitatis, Series: Philosophy, Sociology, Psychology and History
سال: 2020
ISSN: 1820-8509,1820-8495
DOI: 10.22190/fupsph2001017b